🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.